How it is that, modernization is
almost synonymous with westernization and English has emerged as the
representative language of globalization? What about rise of Persian with
persianization, rise of Islam with Arabization?
rise of Turks with Turkization? What about Spanish speaking people in Latin
America and French speaking class in North Africa? In fact, transnational
languages are footprints of the past empires. Middle East and Central Asia are considered as graveyard of empires and although there are no more empires but the lingual
divides and the continuing competition of languages over populations are still reminding
us of the legacies of those majestic empires. Pakistan is an interesting case study is this
regard.
The national language of Pakistan
is Urdu and Urdu speaking community is called Muhajir (Immigrants) because they
emigrated from North India during partition of India-Pakistan. In fact, Urdu is
a legacy of Mughal Empire and is very recent to be added to the family of
languages and people of North India adapted it (created it during Mughal
Empire). Likewise, English is the official language of Pakistan and it is the
legacy of English Empire. Just as English Empire had replaced Mughal Empire,
similarly, the English language had first replaced Persian as an official
language and then slowly distorting/enriching Urdu by replacing Persian and
Arabic words and expressions in it.
I think, the best explanation can be Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of “Cultural Capital”. He has borrowed the concept from Marx Capital and hence represents any cultural aspect (education, intellect, style of speech, dress, and even physical appearance, et cetera) that helps social mobility. Language stands at the core of cultural capital and it really explains why, with the rise of each empire, the language of empire was adapted by other people. It really explains why founders of Pakistan adapted Urdu as a national language and English as official language. Urdu was the heritage of Muslim (Mughal) empire (glorious past) but English was the coinage of current empire.
It is interesting to note that, despite of very obvious influence of cultural capital on every segments of modern societies, Marxist movements of last century and even recent 99% movement were largely based on economic class divide. And that is because cultural capital are the products of economic and social capitals. By increasing digitalization of the social institutions, the influence of the cultural capital are deepening. Seeing the people of previous generation, even those who weren't able to read and write properly are struggling to catch up with basic technologies are an indication of a social urgency and the role that cultural capital is playing in it.
No comments:
Post a Comment