On Monday, my youngest brother (who is an eighth grader) came on skype to consult me about his current endeavors. He was asking me, how he can become a good software engineer and a good writer? I recommended him some of my favorite writers, Chekhov, Dostoevsky and Oscar Wilde and told him stories of Mark Zuckerberg (The founder of Facebook), Steve Jobs (Founder of Apple), Bill Gates (Founder of Microsoft) and Niklas Zennström (Founder of Skype). We exchanged ideas on how to do things and what to expect and what to not and so forth. After we are done with our conversations, I felt a little bit envious of him as he has access to internet and elder brothers that he consults.
When I was an eighth grader, I was maintaining a thick encyclopedic diary that had my aphorismatic expressions (Uncle Nietzsche), schemes of new plays (Good idea; if you can’t compete in existing plays then why not to create new ones? …But frankly, it was more an effort to have more useful plays than cricket), designs for their outfits and play grounds, exterior architectures of buildings that I liked to build someday (heheheh), List of problems of our society and my suggested solutions (how naïve), notes of medicinal plants, chemical properties of some compounds of interests, thinking strategies, some characters (I was always failing to balance the body parts and my characters were closer to beasts to than what I was imagining them to appear on paper) and stories based on them (loved to watch cartoons and wanted to write my own comic books) and of course my Philosophical constructions (Yeah, Uncle Socrates were very thoughtful on those days…hehehe)…. Though I had an encyclopedic diary that I was regularly and passionately updating but to others it was just a sketchbook of a kid and there was nobody to tell me, what to do and where to go… I was a curious but disoriented school boy…. The books were scarce and my pocket was empty. There was just a burning curiosity and a passionate learner and his only guidance was the story of Bernard Shaw that his uncle told him (My uncle was my class fellow and we are almost of same age). The story goes,
George Bernard Shaw hated formal education so he had not proper formal education. One day he was crossing a street and found a piece of newspaper. Just out of curirosity he picked it up and started reading the story on it. As it was only a torn off part of newspaper, he could not finish the story but the story touched him so much that wanted to learn about rest of the story. He started going to libraries and reading books to find the rest of story. Although he didn’t find the missing part of the story but in the process of looking for it he read so much that he became a learned person and a known writer….
I don’t know, how much of this story is real as I had only heard of it but it was always at top of my mind and I was reading everything I had access to but there wasn’t enough books to read…. I still remember the first fat story book that I read. I was so happy that I read a book. My grand Ma shifted to a new house and there was a college girl that had some story books. It was there that I read my first fat story book. Before that I had access to magazines, thin booklets for children that either I was buying from bookstore or was borrowing from school library. There was a bookstore with some thick books on its shelves and one of the books was “Shahnama Firdosi”. I was looking to its beautifully decorated cover with images of legendary Rostam and was wishing for a day I would be able to buy this book…
When our school received new books, I was so excited that I was not missing any spare to read them and even was using class time to read them. To hide from teachers I was putting book on my lap under desk to read them in class (Greed never dies..still, I get that much greedy if something excites me).
If the confessions of Gandhi about his youth let me to have more humanistic view about “great men”, the stories of Avicenna, Jabir Bin Hayan, Ibn Battuta and an European Astronomer that I don’t remember his name excited and allowed me to enter into the world of real characters than story characters that until that time was known to me. One of the books was about a Persian doctor who goes to India to learn medicine and meets a Persian girl there, falls in love with her, marries her but she becomes sick and dies. When doctor sees that his medicine fails to save the life of his lover, he abandons medicine and turns to spiritualism. This story was so touching that I decided that I am not going to fall in love with any girl (hehehe.. A kid grows just to undo his childish decisions…hehehehe) ….
In 1989, my father built his own house and we moved from Grand Pa’s house to our house. This shifting brought new opportunities for me. It was far from city so I was getting more pocket money to go on bus and also there weren’t many shops so I had more money in my pocket. I was able to buy second hand books and exchange mine with those of my uncle… Soon there was a small library at our town managed by one of our schoolmate and then I got membership of Provincial library and this changed my life as I had access to real knowledge (Big fat books with big names on their covers)
But the biggest paradigm shift in my thinking came from a refugee family. In summer of 1998, Taliban captured Mazar-i-Sharif and massacred the local Hazara population. A large number of survivals escaped to neighboring countries. As our city is close to Afghanistan, a large number of survivals took refuge there. There were families who were staying in mosques and had no place to move. People were trying to accommodate them. We had a small multi-purpose extra room and one of the families moved in. There were 7 members in the family, a dark tanned, skinny father, a tall skinny mother, three daughters and two sons the eldest and second youngest. The father was sick and barely able to walk and they had nothing to live on.
I was always amazed that how this family of seven was managing to live in that small room? Seven people could sit there but it had not enough space for seven people to sleep there. His eldest son started working in a shoe workshop with hundred rupees per week as “wage”. The two girls who may be 13 or 14 years old (I am guessing) were doing embroidery works with their mother, again for few hundred rupees per scarf. They were sitting all day doing embroidery and were able to finish a scarf in few days to earn a few hundred rupees. The father was very sick but still he was going to bring the hard firewood to make benches. In my whole life, I have never seen such a determination and skill. A sick man just with three hand tools were sawing and carving benches out of such hardwood that strong baker workers can just think of cutting them in large pieces for fire. Later on, he became so sick that he wasn’t able to sit and even go to washroom and was lying in that small room.
What was really shocking for all of us that in two years that they lived in our house, we never seen them a drop of tear in their eyes, a sign of grief or worry or any complain. When they were out, they were neat, smiley and talkative but no talk of pain or their difficulties. Though we were aware that they were in trouble but we could not figure out what they eat, how they eat or when eat or even if they go hungry. Even the youngest daughter who was only 4 or 5 years old was behaving so maturely and with dignity that other children of her age could hardly do. This family even changed our behaviors and thinking about life. From one side we were seeing the wealthy families’ favorite talks are complaining and backbiting and here was a family who was so dignified that were facing misfortunes of life in such a dignity and bravery that was almost idealistic (At least I can’t do it even now).
They had earned so much of our respect that we were very careful in our interactions to not offend them even unintentionally. My father knew some organizations that were helping poor families but the problem was how to reach them to not offend this dignified family. My mother talked to them and they finally accepted to get their father hospitalized and get treated by the charity organization but it was too late. Their father had stomach cancer and died in hospital. I still remember that time when the body of their father was brought in, I felt as my heart was ripped off. How could life be so cruel to such nice people? But they were calm and didn’t show any signs of discomfort. I was sure that they had mourned in their small room (out of sights of others) but in front of people they showed no symptoms of grief.
Until that time, I was aware of characters in stories of Russian writers who had hard times but those characters were noisy and complaining about their lives and here I was seeing everyday a family who were facing tragedy after tragedy but facing life with such a dignity that left me envious of such self-restraint and resilience forever.
It was first time that I felt, I was mistaken for so long that I was looking knowledge in books. The human around us with their life perspectives are open books. I was just needed to study them and learn. I am really thankful to that family that changed my perspective. Believe it or not, fat books no more excite me and I am no more piling up books. Whenever, I have hard time, I just remember that family and get enough to overcome over my emotions. Yes, I still spend a large part of my time reading but my real inspirations come from live people….
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Monday, February 20, 2012
My picks from Korean Dramas
Some of the Korean dramas are really impressive due to their educational content for social change and how to go for them through entertainment. Just like any other drama, the stories revolve around main character (Like butcher becoming a surgeon, a scholar becoming an entrepreneur, a lady becoming a court cook and doctor and so on) but they are written in adventurous and biographical styles in which the main characters are following a goal that make them stand taller. I am not picking them because these dramas are based on biographies but instead I am picking them because the main characters break the prevailing divides in society based on class systems or cultural norms. The dedication, determination and above all, relying on constant learning and experimentations of main characters to demonstrate the fallacy of social divides are what make these dramas unique, in a time when all are focused on technologies than human talents and characters.
Another aspect of these dramas that really interests me is the linking of the traditional knowledge system to that of modern one. Historical societies like that of Korea have been accumulating vast knowledge about human nature for long time. It is really a great experience to see, though in terms of literature and arts, the transition of a society especially when the globalization is making things go faster than historical societies could accommodate properly.
Coming back to this dramas, I think, Korean artists really need appreciation from rest of world by creating such nice crafts that from one side ask for social change and from other side showing how to do it while entertaining all groups of societies across of ages.
I do not want to make my own interpretations of these dramas so I just present their descriptions and links for the first episode so you could watch them at your ease, if you like them….
One more thing, I may update this page from time to time… Cheers :)
Click on the title to watch them online....
Summaries are taken from dramafans
............................................................................
Jewel in the Palace,
Summary
About 500 years ago during the time of Chosun Dynasty, Korea boasted a rigidly hierarchical and male dominated social structure. Set in this period, "Jewel in the Palace" is based on a true story about a legendary girl (Jang-Geum) who became the first woman to be the supreme royal physician of her times. Despite her poor condition as a low class girl in the male dominated society, Jang-Geum overcame a series of social discrimination and landed herself as a royal cook, later becoming the royal physician, then ultimately the physician in charge of the king. She was even given by the king the title "The Great Jang-Geum". The story of her checkered life on her success and breakdown as well as her love story beautifully unfold. "Jewel in the Palace" is sure to touch your heart.
...................................................................................
Dong Yi (It appeared to me as a Korean version of Sherlock Holmes)
Summary
Set during the reign of King Sukjong in the Joseon dynasty, the story focuses on Dong Yi, a water maid who gains the trust of Queen Inhyeon and later the favour of the king when he is moved by her prayers for the health of the Queen during the court disputes caused by Jang Hee Bin. Dong Yi becomes a concubine with the rank of sook-bin and bears a son who will later become the 21st king of Joseon, Yeongjo.
......................................................................................
Jejoongwon
Summary
A story about the hospital, Jejoongwon. It was the first modern hospital in Korea established in the Joseon era in 1886. (To me, the interesting point was the linking of a butcher to surgeon, both do the same things but it is just the observations, ethics and purpose that makes them so different)...
......................................................................................
Iljimae
Summary
Set during the Joseon Dynasty, Ryung acts as a useless gangster in the marketplace by day but at night he is a chivalrous robber who robs corrupt government officials to give to the poor. After each robbery he leaves behind a wooden branch from a plum tree at the site of the robbery to take responsibility for the robbery. The poor citizens only know him as Iljimae. Bong Soon is a hilarious girl with good martial art skills and lives as a swindler. She only loves Ryung and sacrifices her whole life for him. Eun Chan is a doctor's daughter and is good in nature and usually helps miserable people. She meets Iljimae once by chance, and their sweet love story begins. However, her love puts Iljimae in a dangerous situation because an Imperial Guard also loves her.
......................................................................................
Jumong (My Favorite :)
It might not be easy for modern men to think of nationality other than nation state, ideological state or an ethnic state but when reading ancient and Medieval history we might frequently see that each dynasty had their own nations. That means, a nation was dying by death of a dynasty and a nation was born out of scratch by rise of another dynasty. How well a nation doing was a test to the abilities and popularity of a dynasty. Jumong beautifully depicts the mindset of the kings and how they were creating a new nation out of scratch based on their visions. If you want to have some glimpses into the minds of ancient kings, this is definitely worth to watch....
Summary,
Song Il Gook plays Ju-Mong, the founder of the Goguryeo Dynasty in 37 BC. Han Hye Jin plays the role Soh Suh No (소서노) who is extremely intelligent and is King Ju Mong's second wife.
.................................................................................
Going to update it later....
Another aspect of these dramas that really interests me is the linking of the traditional knowledge system to that of modern one. Historical societies like that of Korea have been accumulating vast knowledge about human nature for long time. It is really a great experience to see, though in terms of literature and arts, the transition of a society especially when the globalization is making things go faster than historical societies could accommodate properly.
Coming back to this dramas, I think, Korean artists really need appreciation from rest of world by creating such nice crafts that from one side ask for social change and from other side showing how to do it while entertaining all groups of societies across of ages.
I do not want to make my own interpretations of these dramas so I just present their descriptions and links for the first episode so you could watch them at your ease, if you like them….
One more thing, I may update this page from time to time… Cheers :)
Click on the title to watch them online....
Summaries are taken from dramafans
............................................................................
Jewel in the Palace,
Summary
About 500 years ago during the time of Chosun Dynasty, Korea boasted a rigidly hierarchical and male dominated social structure. Set in this period, "Jewel in the Palace" is based on a true story about a legendary girl (Jang-Geum) who became the first woman to be the supreme royal physician of her times. Despite her poor condition as a low class girl in the male dominated society, Jang-Geum overcame a series of social discrimination and landed herself as a royal cook, later becoming the royal physician, then ultimately the physician in charge of the king. She was even given by the king the title "The Great Jang-Geum". The story of her checkered life on her success and breakdown as well as her love story beautifully unfold. "Jewel in the Palace" is sure to touch your heart.
...................................................................................
Dong Yi (It appeared to me as a Korean version of Sherlock Holmes)
Summary
Set during the reign of King Sukjong in the Joseon dynasty, the story focuses on Dong Yi, a water maid who gains the trust of Queen Inhyeon and later the favour of the king when he is moved by her prayers for the health of the Queen during the court disputes caused by Jang Hee Bin. Dong Yi becomes a concubine with the rank of sook-bin and bears a son who will later become the 21st king of Joseon, Yeongjo.
......................................................................................
Jejoongwon
Summary
A story about the hospital, Jejoongwon. It was the first modern hospital in Korea established in the Joseon era in 1886. (To me, the interesting point was the linking of a butcher to surgeon, both do the same things but it is just the observations, ethics and purpose that makes them so different)...
......................................................................................
Iljimae
Summary
Set during the Joseon Dynasty, Ryung acts as a useless gangster in the marketplace by day but at night he is a chivalrous robber who robs corrupt government officials to give to the poor. After each robbery he leaves behind a wooden branch from a plum tree at the site of the robbery to take responsibility for the robbery. The poor citizens only know him as Iljimae. Bong Soon is a hilarious girl with good martial art skills and lives as a swindler. She only loves Ryung and sacrifices her whole life for him. Eun Chan is a doctor's daughter and is good in nature and usually helps miserable people. She meets Iljimae once by chance, and their sweet love story begins. However, her love puts Iljimae in a dangerous situation because an Imperial Guard also loves her.
......................................................................................
Jumong (My Favorite :)
It might not be easy for modern men to think of nationality other than nation state, ideological state or an ethnic state but when reading ancient and Medieval history we might frequently see that each dynasty had their own nations. That means, a nation was dying by death of a dynasty and a nation was born out of scratch by rise of another dynasty. How well a nation doing was a test to the abilities and popularity of a dynasty. Jumong beautifully depicts the mindset of the kings and how they were creating a new nation out of scratch based on their visions. If you want to have some glimpses into the minds of ancient kings, this is definitely worth to watch....
Summary,
Song Il Gook plays Ju-Mong, the founder of the Goguryeo Dynasty in 37 BC. Han Hye Jin plays the role Soh Suh No (소서노) who is extremely intelligent and is King Ju Mong's second wife.
.................................................................................
Going to update it later....
Friday, February 17, 2012
When we question the basics
There is no doubt that the hardest questions are posed in conflicts. Usually, we take most of things we see or live with for granted but when things become problematic then the most basic things come under question in a quest for solutions. I think, it is one of the main reasons that those people who go with an aim to change others, change from within. People who have even a casual interest in Philosophy know that the popular names in Philosophy like those of Socrates, Plato, Nietzsche and Sartre were a thorn to the eyes of their times’ dominant social norms and if one is also aware of the context, knows clearly that their revolts were the outcome of their experiences to conflicts of their times. If Socrates and Plato were concerned about the decline of Athenian civilization as a result of prolonged internal conflicts between city states, Nietzsche was witnessing the losing grip of God’s representatives to those of peoples’ representatives after a long conflict between Church and Naturalists and Sartre had witnessed and participated in most devastating conflicts that human history ever had.
Though the nature of conflicts has been changing over time but it seems the sources of the conflicts have been remained the same and this consistency in the historical pattern of conflicts made it easy to predict future conflicts. Since WWII, the world was in a conflict between two balancing superpowers but by collapse of Soviet Union, there was a prevailing hope for a more prosperous world of least conflicts. However, in midst of this hope, Samuel Huntington predicted for vaster, deeper and more chaotic, post-soviet conflicts, “the clash of civilizations”. For Huntington, it was not difficult to draw conflict zones or fault lines between major civilizations as the world is very well segregated based on the “values”, each civilization identifies itself with.
One may say that Huntington has grossly divided the world into eight civilizations but there are nearly 206 “sovereign states” with their own laws. It is the nation states, not the civilizations that play main roles in the conflicts. That might seems true but a close look at the coordination and congregation of state in international spheres reveals that states also identify themselves with their relative civilizations and that makes Samuel Huntington’s assumptions look true in practice. In theory, states should go after their interests then how civilizational divide could happen to be interest divide as well? My thinking is that, the answer lies in values. We recognize civilizations based on their set of values. In other words it is the set of values that make civilizations distinct. The values not only guide the social objectives but also how to go after those objectives and this makes a frame of interests. Countries with common values find close social objectives and ways to achieve them so naturally their interests to a large extent become common.
In a world that is increasingly shrinking, the civilizational divides are felt ever strong than before. Since the beginning of new millennium, the world is really suffering from the civilizational conflicts. In the opening paragraph, I said that in times of intense conflicts or decline, some Philosophers were coming with their themes to question the very basic of prevailing values that are causing conflicts. Plato came with concept of “Philosopher King”, Nietzsche came with idea of “Superman” and the Sartre came with idea of “revolt for freedom”. May be the sudden influx of massive information have occupied the minds of out time to an extent that there are rarely any brain left to challenge with an effective voice against the prevailing civilizational divide in the globalized world….
Coming back to our main topic, the main purpose of “values” in the first place is to improve the quality of life. If we look to major civilizations, the core message in the heart of each civilization is improving the quality of life. Now that civilizations are at conflict, the basic objective of values that was improving the quality of life is at stake.
It really doesn’t matter where you stand in these clashes, the impact comes at your doorstep and it comes through very fabric of society, laws. Every society has laws. Actually, laws are baseline for social acceptability. If one obeys laws, he has done nothing appreciable but if one breaks the laws, he becomes criminal and is expected to be punished accordingly. We usually take the laws for granted but those who understand it, don’t look at them as they were forever there. See the following two quotes,
“Law and order exist for the purpose of establishing justice and when they fail in this purpose they become the dangerously structured dams that block the flow of social progress.” …..Martin Luther King
“If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so.” …….Thomas Jefferson
As I said before, the values are there to improve the quality of life, similarly the laws are there to maintain justice in society. Unjust laws are not tolerated so does it mean that all existing laws are just? Again, it depends on the concept of justice. One law might look just in a society and unjust in another society. Why? The main reason is again the values. The concept of justice comes from social values. Even the divide within of each civilization into camps of liberal and conservatives are a sprouted from the core values each recognize it with.
Once I had to teach social studies for a brief time at school and I made a sketch to show the connection between values and laws. I think, it is relevant here,
Whenever, I hear the term “our values” from a politician, I know he/she wants to rally people against others. So, what is the solution? In theory, the Human Rights declaration was a step forward for global values instead of civilizational values. But each civilization has a well-developed culture to support its values and to carve them in the children as they grow with those values. Unfortunately, human rights is not recognized with any existing civilization so there is no culture for it to support, incorporate and carve it in children as they grow. Though in theory, Human Rights declaration has opened up a way. But it is really unfortunate that in practice, it is used for “clash of civilizations” or in the service of national interests.
In theory, we can revolt against civilizational values in favor of global values but it might take some heavy damages and losses for world to give concessions to global values at cost of civilizational values…. Humanely dreams can’t dope up those who have been doped with hatred and greed…
Though the nature of conflicts has been changing over time but it seems the sources of the conflicts have been remained the same and this consistency in the historical pattern of conflicts made it easy to predict future conflicts. Since WWII, the world was in a conflict between two balancing superpowers but by collapse of Soviet Union, there was a prevailing hope for a more prosperous world of least conflicts. However, in midst of this hope, Samuel Huntington predicted for vaster, deeper and more chaotic, post-soviet conflicts, “the clash of civilizations”. For Huntington, it was not difficult to draw conflict zones or fault lines between major civilizations as the world is very well segregated based on the “values”, each civilization identifies itself with.
One may say that Huntington has grossly divided the world into eight civilizations but there are nearly 206 “sovereign states” with their own laws. It is the nation states, not the civilizations that play main roles in the conflicts. That might seems true but a close look at the coordination and congregation of state in international spheres reveals that states also identify themselves with their relative civilizations and that makes Samuel Huntington’s assumptions look true in practice. In theory, states should go after their interests then how civilizational divide could happen to be interest divide as well? My thinking is that, the answer lies in values. We recognize civilizations based on their set of values. In other words it is the set of values that make civilizations distinct. The values not only guide the social objectives but also how to go after those objectives and this makes a frame of interests. Countries with common values find close social objectives and ways to achieve them so naturally their interests to a large extent become common.
In a world that is increasingly shrinking, the civilizational divides are felt ever strong than before. Since the beginning of new millennium, the world is really suffering from the civilizational conflicts. In the opening paragraph, I said that in times of intense conflicts or decline, some Philosophers were coming with their themes to question the very basic of prevailing values that are causing conflicts. Plato came with concept of “Philosopher King”, Nietzsche came with idea of “Superman” and the Sartre came with idea of “revolt for freedom”. May be the sudden influx of massive information have occupied the minds of out time to an extent that there are rarely any brain left to challenge with an effective voice against the prevailing civilizational divide in the globalized world….
Coming back to our main topic, the main purpose of “values” in the first place is to improve the quality of life. If we look to major civilizations, the core message in the heart of each civilization is improving the quality of life. Now that civilizations are at conflict, the basic objective of values that was improving the quality of life is at stake.
It really doesn’t matter where you stand in these clashes, the impact comes at your doorstep and it comes through very fabric of society, laws. Every society has laws. Actually, laws are baseline for social acceptability. If one obeys laws, he has done nothing appreciable but if one breaks the laws, he becomes criminal and is expected to be punished accordingly. We usually take the laws for granted but those who understand it, don’t look at them as they were forever there. See the following two quotes,
“Law and order exist for the purpose of establishing justice and when they fail in this purpose they become the dangerously structured dams that block the flow of social progress.” …..Martin Luther King
“If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so.” …….Thomas Jefferson
As I said before, the values are there to improve the quality of life, similarly the laws are there to maintain justice in society. Unjust laws are not tolerated so does it mean that all existing laws are just? Again, it depends on the concept of justice. One law might look just in a society and unjust in another society. Why? The main reason is again the values. The concept of justice comes from social values. Even the divide within of each civilization into camps of liberal and conservatives are a sprouted from the core values each recognize it with.
Once I had to teach social studies for a brief time at school and I made a sketch to show the connection between values and laws. I think, it is relevant here,
Whenever, I hear the term “our values” from a politician, I know he/she wants to rally people against others. So, what is the solution? In theory, the Human Rights declaration was a step forward for global values instead of civilizational values. But each civilization has a well-developed culture to support its values and to carve them in the children as they grow with those values. Unfortunately, human rights is not recognized with any existing civilization so there is no culture for it to support, incorporate and carve it in children as they grow. Though in theory, Human Rights declaration has opened up a way. But it is really unfortunate that in practice, it is used for “clash of civilizations” or in the service of national interests.
In theory, we can revolt against civilizational values in favor of global values but it might take some heavy damages and losses for world to give concessions to global values at cost of civilizational values…. Humanely dreams can’t dope up those who have been doped with hatred and greed…
Saturday, February 11, 2012
Robert Kagan on Why the World Needs America?
Recently there are increasing talks about the decline of an American "Empire" and a lot of speculations about the post-American world. The fact that we have witnessed increasingly chaotic world after the collapse of Soviet "Empire" while still USA was there to maintain order make these speculations interesting. The world that we live today has shrunk immensely since collapse of Soviet Union so in an increasingly interdependent and connected world, whatever would be the outcomes, all would be affected in many ways.... It is not necessary that we agree with these speculations but they are definitely interesting to learn about....
One thing that is missing in this talk (that you will notices) is that... while a lot of people talk about the role of USA and her allies in collapse of Soviet Union, who is then responsible for American Decline? In a uni-polar world and in absence of a real contestant, the wrong policies have been blamed... It seems that individual's efforts in changing others mostly results in changes within... fits to nations also... Definitely, it is interesting times in live history to be a witness, learn and pass on..... Hope you enjoy it...
One thing that is missing in this talk (that you will notices) is that... while a lot of people talk about the role of USA and her allies in collapse of Soviet Union, who is then responsible for American Decline? In a uni-polar world and in absence of a real contestant, the wrong policies have been blamed... It seems that individual's efforts in changing others mostly results in changes within... fits to nations also... Definitely, it is interesting times in live history to be a witness, learn and pass on..... Hope you enjoy it...
Friday, February 10, 2012
Breaking the machine of "Observations" and "Speculations"
What is beauty?
There might be a lot of explanations to that but what if you have a machine of truth? A machine that could produce reality. That would be very easy to answer. Since the emergence of machines, human tend to make machines for doing everything, even for reality. Religion was a machine of reality for many thousands of years and worked very well...until it got a competitor in the market by another powerful machine, "Science"... By widespread use of evolutionary theory, Science seems like having grown from a machine into a factory that produces such machines as "theory of evolution" that can explain everything with ease,
Dennis Dutton seems like to use "Evolutionary machine" in explaining beauty and he thinks it does efficiently answer that but he doesn't limit himself to beauty and thinks that even art can be explained in evolutionary perspective... That is really plausible but when I see at works of art (Art like Science is a factory to produce aesthetics) then I think, Picasso might not agree with this explanation. Art is not merely an expression of beauty (What would be the difference between the work of an artist and the work of an artisan? An artisan might produce much more skilled and beautiful artifacts). Art also serves two other distinct purposes, "An expression of wealth and social class" and "An object of rebellion; pushing for more freedom"... I don't see that these two values have rooted in beauty. Abstract and modern art came to rebel two aspects of modern society,
- Machines; that is capable of creating much skilled, accurate and complex works of art that can produce on mass scale and with very low prices.... So artists broke the lines and played with colors to distort the "beauty", "organization" and "perceived world" as an expression of their "humane feelings" that machines don't have and can't produce.... Now, the people with high class buy these abstracts arts at high prices to create a distinct culture from those of machine produced cheap works of arts that commoners can afford...
- Political and Social system; Arts that are used in political and social rebellions for more freedom are not usually the expression of beauty but of oppression, blood, pain and misery... This works of arts are not to seduce but to reduce the hold of power and influence over others....
Over the years, I have realized that two things can never be wrong and can find uncountable number of evidences to support them...so people who play around these two categories have a lot to play with...
"God-Centric" VS "Human-Centric".... One can easily trace the battle of "God-centric" VS "Human-Centric" even from Pre-historic times to our present day and I am confident that it will continue in the future....
"God" as an Almighty and invisible can never be "proved" or "disproved" because there is no way to do it. So all the efforts of proving and disproving is mere battle of words... It depends on the individuals whether to believe on Him or not...
"Human" on other hand, observe the world and understand it through themselves (Human is the observer and human is the judge), so it is not difficult to understand that linking things to human goes very well to human sense... In other words, it makes sense to some point to all...
So I would rather tend to limit myself to observations for "facts" and enjoy the "explanations" and "theories" as acts of "creativity and speculations" that have more to do with schools of thoughts than reality.....
Last words; If one says, according to this theory or faith, this is so and so, I would rather agree but if one says that this and that theory or faith represent the "facts" or "reality", I would rather say, it represent a school of thought and help us to satisfy ourselves in having some explanations for our observations...
Conclusion; Until now, Science has proved to be the best among "ways" that human knowledge proceeds and "evolutionary theory" is among the best to "explain" things very well but I think, we have to be aware of "working very well" and "presenting it as reality".... Who knows in near future or in distant future, we see another "competitor" in the market...
There might be a lot of explanations to that but what if you have a machine of truth? A machine that could produce reality. That would be very easy to answer. Since the emergence of machines, human tend to make machines for doing everything, even for reality. Religion was a machine of reality for many thousands of years and worked very well...until it got a competitor in the market by another powerful machine, "Science"... By widespread use of evolutionary theory, Science seems like having grown from a machine into a factory that produces such machines as "theory of evolution" that can explain everything with ease,
Dennis Dutton seems like to use "Evolutionary machine" in explaining beauty and he thinks it does efficiently answer that but he doesn't limit himself to beauty and thinks that even art can be explained in evolutionary perspective... That is really plausible but when I see at works of art (Art like Science is a factory to produce aesthetics) then I think, Picasso might not agree with this explanation. Art is not merely an expression of beauty (What would be the difference between the work of an artist and the work of an artisan? An artisan might produce much more skilled and beautiful artifacts). Art also serves two other distinct purposes, "An expression of wealth and social class" and "An object of rebellion; pushing for more freedom"... I don't see that these two values have rooted in beauty. Abstract and modern art came to rebel two aspects of modern society,
- Machines; that is capable of creating much skilled, accurate and complex works of art that can produce on mass scale and with very low prices.... So artists broke the lines and played with colors to distort the "beauty", "organization" and "perceived world" as an expression of their "humane feelings" that machines don't have and can't produce.... Now, the people with high class buy these abstracts arts at high prices to create a distinct culture from those of machine produced cheap works of arts that commoners can afford...
- Political and Social system; Arts that are used in political and social rebellions for more freedom are not usually the expression of beauty but of oppression, blood, pain and misery... This works of arts are not to seduce but to reduce the hold of power and influence over others....
Over the years, I have realized that two things can never be wrong and can find uncountable number of evidences to support them...so people who play around these two categories have a lot to play with...
"God-Centric" VS "Human-Centric".... One can easily trace the battle of "God-centric" VS "Human-Centric" even from Pre-historic times to our present day and I am confident that it will continue in the future....
"God" as an Almighty and invisible can never be "proved" or "disproved" because there is no way to do it. So all the efforts of proving and disproving is mere battle of words... It depends on the individuals whether to believe on Him or not...
"Human" on other hand, observe the world and understand it through themselves (Human is the observer and human is the judge), so it is not difficult to understand that linking things to human goes very well to human sense... In other words, it makes sense to some point to all...
So I would rather tend to limit myself to observations for "facts" and enjoy the "explanations" and "theories" as acts of "creativity and speculations" that have more to do with schools of thoughts than reality.....
Last words; If one says, according to this theory or faith, this is so and so, I would rather agree but if one says that this and that theory or faith represent the "facts" or "reality", I would rather say, it represent a school of thought and help us to satisfy ourselves in having some explanations for our observations...
Conclusion; Until now, Science has proved to be the best among "ways" that human knowledge proceeds and "evolutionary theory" is among the best to "explain" things very well but I think, we have to be aware of "working very well" and "presenting it as reality".... Who knows in near future or in distant future, we see another "competitor" in the market...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)